Tuesday, October 24, 2006
MOVEMENTS BY COMPANIES
I pastor a “mega-church” and I believe in “church-multiplication” so it may sound wrong to you that I would say that shouldn’t be our primary strategy – but it shouldn’t. We’re building a new 2,000 seat auditorium, have a large staff, and do a lot of the things that come with a mega-church. But, we must be clear, there has never been a church planting movement begun and sustained and replicated by mega-churches! I still believe in mega-churches – I believe in all churches and each one has a critical role. I believe mega-churches can produce mega-churches AND smaller churches that give scale, leverage, and resources to movements – not that it happens often here in the West as much as in the East.
The question is do we want to start a lot of churches or do we want to get into multiplication and perhaps a movement? We know the answer – multiplication and movement.
Army designations of size are as follows:
Soldier – basic unit
Squad – 9-10 for specific missions and fire power
Platoon – 16–44
Company - 62-190
Battalion – 300-1,000
Brigade – 3,000-5,000
Division – 10,000-15,000
Corps – 20,000-45,000
Army – 50,000+
The real work and effectiveness of the army comes in squads, platoons, and companies, this is how each other division is broke down in order to accomplish.
There will be no multiplication movement without a strategy that can produce churches at the smallest unit size possible. If the focus on church planting is only planting mega-churches then we dramatically limit who can be involved and who can plant. We wind up with a pool of 1200 churches to start a movement. HOWEVER, if we focus on units of 100 or less, we wind up with 350,000 potential players! Let the other 348,800 play! The answer to a movement is not looking for a handful of guys to start relatively speaking a handful of churches – but looking for a mass of guys to start a mass of churches at the smallest reproducible unit available!
U.S. western church history 150 years ago is no less than a house church movement! It’s true. Someone would give a piece of land out on the prairie where several tracts came together and people from the surrounding area would build a chapel that would hold 75 or less. They put a steeple on it and called it a church. They spent the day together and had dinner on the grounds because it was the only time in the week people could gather – not just for preach’in and sing’in!
We will have a movement when we focus the strategy not on a handful of rising stars who get media, marketing, etc. but when average people are planting churches of a few dozen. This is why I believe so much in house churches and smaller churches. This is why I am so passionate that the motives be based on reaching the lost versus being anti whatever.
For something to be viral you can’t limit who plays. You need to open the gate so all can play! This is why we must make heroes out of churches led by smaller pastors versus a few well-placed guys. If we do that – we just may have a movement. If we don’t, we’ll never have one. I promise you-and as we say in Texas – you can take that to the bank! Am I right Curtis Sergeant!!!!!!!!!
Church planting is happening all around us we just don't see it. I issued permits in Fort Worth. Each year about 5 or 6 small churches would try to move into to storefronts. They would not meet the building codes and I would work with them to get the variances they needed to open. There is an expression that it is easier to cut in on a girl dancing with someone else than it is to get her out on the dance floor in the first place. What if we inventoried these small churches in storefronts in the inner city and partnered with them by giving them materials and training, inviting them to educational conferences etc. This would reduce barriers between black and white churches and maybe some other benefits.
<< Home